_____________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employee
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 81-573 – April 29, 1985
Board of Trustees: Joseph Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William B. Jordan,
Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
level of health benefits coverage under the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan. They hereby
render their opinion on this matter.
Background Facts
The Complainant worked as a classified Employee for the Respondent from July 7, 1981, to
September 1984. Information presented to the Funds shows that unpaid medical bills were
incurred from March 12, 1981, to January 4, 1982. This dispute arises from the Complainant’s
belief that the Respondent has failed to provide him and his dependents with health benefits
coverage at the level specified in the Wage Agreement. A garnishment in the amount of $601.60
was issued against him on December 7; 1984.
The Respondent maintains that any bills incurred by the Complainant prior to the
commencement of his employment on July 7, 1981, are not covered. In addition, it has stated
that the Complainant failed to pay his co-payments as specified in the Employer Benefit Plan and
therefore accumulated a balance due. The Respondent does acknowledge that there was a
change in insurance carriers in August of 1981 which might have caused some confusion, but
claims that every effort has been made to sort out those charges for which it is responsible.
Dispute
Is the Respondent responsible for payment of $601.60 in medical charges incurred by the
Complainant and his dependents from March 12, 1981, to January 4, 1982?
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainant: The Respondent is responsible for’ provision of benefits coverage
at the level specified in the Benefit Plan.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 81-573
Page 2
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent is not responsible for charges incurred prior to the
Complainant’s employment nor for charges representing co-payments which are the
Complainant’s responsibility under the Benefit Plan.
Pertinent Provisions
Article I (1) (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
1. “Employer” means coal company.
2. “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1981, as amended from time to time and any successor
agreement.
4. “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A(1) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
Benefits under Article III shall be provided to any Employee who:
1. is actively at work* for the Employer on the effective date of the Wage
Agreement;
4. A new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day worked
with the Employer.
Article III A(8) and (11) (a) 18 of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
8. Co-Payments
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 81-573
Page 3
Certain benefits provided in this Plan shall be subject to the co-payments set forth
below and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of the Beneficiary. The Plan
Administrator shall implement such procedures, as deemed appropriate to achieve the
intent of these co-payments. Beneficiaries and providers shall provide such information
as the Plan Administrator may require effectively administer these co-payments, or such
Beneficiaries providers shall not be eligible for benefits or payments under this Plan.
Any overpayments made to a provider who over-charges the Plan in lieu of collecting the
applicable co-payment from a participant or Beneficiary shall be repaid to the Plan
Administrator by such provider.
For purpose [sic] of this paragraph (8), the working group shall be deemed to be
Beneficiaries who are described in Article II A C(3) and their eligible dependents. The
non-working group shall be deemed to be Beneficiaries who are described in Article II B,
C(2) and E and their eligible dependents.
Co-Payments for Health Benefits are established as follows:
Benefit Co-Payment
(a) Physician services as an Working Group — $7.50 per visit
outpatient as set forth in up to a maximum of $150 per 12-
section A(2) and physician month period* per family.
visits in connection with the
benefits set forth in section
A(3), paragraph (c) but only Non-Working Group – $5 per
for pre- and post-natal visit visit up to a maximum of $100
if the physician charges sepa- per 12-month period* per
rately for such visits in ad- family.
dition to the charge for de
livery, and paragraphs (g)
through (m), paragraph (n) ex
cept inpatient surgery, para
graph (o) and section A (7)
paragraph (f)
(b) Prescription Drugs and in-$5 per prescription or refill
sulin as set forth in section up to a $50 maximum per 12-
A(4) and take-home drugs fol- month period* per family. Note:
lowing a hospital confinement For purposes of this co-payas set forth in section ment provision, a prescription
A(1)(a). or refill shall be deemed to be
deemed to be each 30 days (or fraction thereof)
supply.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 81-573
Page 4
If an employee is covered under an employer Plan (established pursuant to the NBCWA of 1978)
by more than one signatory employer during a 12-month period*
, the total Co-payments made by
the employee during such period shall be
counted toward the 12-month maximum.
*
March 27, 1981 to March 26, 1982
March 27, 1982 to March 26, 1983
March 27, 1983 to March 26, 1984
March 24, 1984 to September 30, 1984
(11) General Exclusions
(a) In addition to the specific exclusions otherwise contained in the
Plan benefits also are not provided for the following:
18. Finance charges in connection with a medical bill.
Discussion
Under Article II A(1) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan, persons who are actively at work for
the Employer on the effective date of the Wage Agreement are eligible to receive health benefits
pursuant to Article III of the Plan. Persons employed after the date of the Wage Agreement will
be eligible from the first day worked with the Employer. Information reported to the Funds
shows that the Complainant was actively employed by the Respondent from July 7, 1981,
through September 1984, and is therefore eligible for health benefits coverage during that time.
An examination of the medical charges shows that $135.00 of the $601.60 judgment has been
paid by the Respondent’s insurance carrier and credited to the Complainant’s account, reducing
the total amount outstanding to $466.60. It has also been established that $175.00 of that amount
represents charges incurred prior to the Complainant’s employment with the Respondent. Since
Article II A (4) provides for benefits coverage for a new Employee from the first date worked for
the Employer, this amount is not the Employer’s responsibility.
Further evaluation of the charges shows that $60.00 represents unpaid co-payments. Article III
A (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan specifies that certain benefits provided in the Plan are subject
to co-payments to be paid by the Beneficiary; these charges are the responsibility of the
Complainant. The remaining charges in question are for $42.50 on August 10, 1981, $140.00 on
August 17-20, 1981, as well as a finance charge of $29.10.
The Respondent maintains that its insurance carrier states it has never received the billings of
August 10 and August 17-20, 1981. The Trustees conclude, however, that because the
Respondent is responsible for providing health benefits coverage at the level specified in the
Wage Agreement, it is responsible for payment of those charges which are within the scope of
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 81-573
Page 5
coverage under the Plan (excluding applicable co-payments) upon proper submission of itemized
claims information.
In reference to the finance charge, Article III A (11) (a) 18 of the Employer Benefit Plan
specifically excludes from coverage finance charges in connection with medical services.
Opinion of the Trustees
The Respondent is responsible for payment of those medical charges, excluding co-payments,
attributable to services covered under the Employer Benefit Plan which were incurred by the
Complainant during the period of his employment from July 7, 1981, through January 4, 1982,
upon proper submission of itemized claims information.
