_____________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employee
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 88-302 – September 24, 1991
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William Miller,
Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee; Thomas H. Saggau, Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for an Employee under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainant worked in a classified position for the Respondent from July 20, 1989 until he
was laid off around June 12, 1990. The Complainant subsequently accepted other employment.
The Complainant has stated that when he began working for the Respondent, the Respondent
provided health benefits coverage through Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
The Complainant has submitted copies of unpaid bills incurred by his spouse for medical
services rendered on December 4 and 5, 1989 and during her hospitalization from December 15,
1989 until January 5, 1990. At the time of her hospital admission, hospital staff contacted Blue
Cross and Blue Shield and were advised that coverage provided by the Respondent through that
carrier was in effect. The hospital submitted claims to that carrier; however, the Complainant
was notified by the carrier in January 1990 that the claims would not be paid because his
coverage was cancelled prior to the date of service. The Complainant contends that the
Respondent failed to maintain coverage as required by the Wage Agreement and is required to
pay his outstanding medical bills.
The Complainant has stated that the Respondent provided coverage through HealthAmerica, a
health maintenance organization (HMO), sometime after his coverage through Blue Cross and
Blue Shield was terminated. The Complainant states that he did not choose the HMO coverage
in lieu of Employer Plan coverage, and he does not know when this change in coverage was
made. The Complainant has submitted a copy of a form letter he received from HealthAmerica
thanking him for subscribing to the HMO and enclosing identification cards for himself and each
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-302
Page 2
covered member of his family. The letter is undated and the Complainant states that he no
longer has the identification cards. The Complainant states that this information was received
sometime in January 1990. The Complainant has stated that shortly after he received the cards,
he was told that this coverage had also been terminated.
Information provided to the Funds by Blue Cross and Blue Shield indicates that coverage
provided by the Respondent through that carrier was only in effect for the month of August
1989. Information provided by HealthAmerica indicates that the Complainant was enrolled in
the HMO under a group plan paid for by the Respondent from October 1, 1989 through January
31, 1990. Additional information provided to the Funds indicates that the Respondent
subsequently provided coverage through a third party claims administrator; however, this
arrangement was terminated July 1, 1990 due to the Respondent’s non-payment of claims and
administrative fees.
Dispute
Whether the Respondent is responsible for payment of the Complainant’s unpaid medical bills.
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainant: The Respondent is responsible for payment of the Complainant’s
medical bills because those bills are unpaid due to the Respondent’s failure to maintain the
Complainant’s health benefits coverage.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent has not replied to repeated correspondence from
Funds’ staff requesting its position in this dispute.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1988 provides in
pertinent part:
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee
benefit plan to provide, implemented through an Insurance carrier(s), health and other nonpension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as pensioners, under the
1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory classified employment was with such
Employer. The benefits provided by the Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such
plans shall be guaranteed during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth
in such plans….
Article I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-302
Page 3
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1988, as amended from time to time and any successor
agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A. (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
(4) A new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day
worked with the Employer.
Article III A. (10) (a) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides in pertinent part:
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
(10) General Provisions
(a) HMO Election
Any Beneficiary as described in Article II, Sections A, B, C, and E
may elect coverage by a certified health maintenance organization
(HMO) in lieu of the health benefits provided under this Plan, in
accordance with Federal or State laws governing HMO’s;
provided, however, that all Beneficiaries in a family shall be
governed by an HMO election.
Discussion
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1988 Wage Agreement requires an Employer to establish and
maintain an Employer Benefit Plan to provide health and other non-pension benefits for it
Employees. The Wage Agreement stipulates that benefits provided by an Employer pursuant to
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-302
Page 4
such Plan shall be guaranteed during the term of the Agreement by that Employer at levels set
forth in such Plan.
Article II A. (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides health benefits coverage for an active
Employee working in a classified job for a signatory Employer. Inasmuch as the Complainant
was actively employed in a classified position by the Respondent from July 20, 1989 until he
was laid-off in June 1990, the Respondent is required to provide health benefits coverage for the
Complainant and his eligible dependents during that period.
Article III A. (10) (a) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides that an Employee may elect
coverage by an HMO in lieu of the health benefits provided under the Employer Benefit Plan,
and that all beneficiaries in a family shall be governed by such HMO election. The Complainant
in this case has unpaid medical bills which were incurred by his spouse in December 1989 and
January 1990. Although the Respondent apparently provided coverage through an HMO at the
time the Complainant’s bills were incurred, the Complainant states that he did not elect such
coverage in lieu of the health benefits provided under the Employer Benefit Plan, that he had not
been notified of such coverage when the bills were incurred, and that his coverage through Blue
Cross and Blue Shield had been confirmed by the provider at the time the bills were incurred.
The Respondent has not responded to repeated requests for information concerning this dispute.
Absent evidence that this HMO coverage was offered by the Respondent and elected by the
Complainant in lieu of the benefits provided under the Employer Benefit Plan, the Respondent is
responsible for payment of the covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his
eligible dependents during December 1989 and January 1990, consistent with the terms of the
Employer Benefit Plan.
Opinion of the Trustees
Absent evidence that HMO coverage was offered by the Respondent and elected by the
Complainant in lieu of the benefits provided under the Employer Benefit Plan, the Respondent is
responsible for payment of the Plan-covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and
his eligible dependents during December 1989 and January 1990, consistent with the terms of
the Employer Benefit Plan.
