_____________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
_____________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainants: Employees
Respondent: Employer
ROD Case No: 88-374 – October 22, 1991
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; William
Killer, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee; Thomas H. Saggau, Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for Employees under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainants are classified Employees of the Respondent, a signatory Employer. The
Complainants contend that the Respondent has failed to provide health benefits coverage at the
level prescribed by the terms of the Employer Benefit Plan established pursuant to the National
Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (“Wage Agreement”) of 1988.
Information provided to the Funds indicates that the Respondent provides health benefits
coverage for the Complainants through Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. Under
this policy, benefit payments are subject to an annual deductible of $100 for each of the first
three family members enrolled and, thereafter, benefits are paid at 80% of the cost of service
until a beneficiary reaches the annual out-of-pocket limit of $500 per person or $1,500 per
family. The Respondent has agreed to pay or reimburse the Complainants for any out-of-pocket
expenses under the 80/20 plan that exceed the 12-month maximum co-payment amount specified
under the Employer Benefit Plan. The Complainants contend that such payments are not being
made. The Complainants have submitted copies of numerous bills and notices from collection
agencies of balances due for medical expenses incurred during their employment with the
Respondent.
The Respondent claims that it provides health benefits coverage for the Complainants as
required by the Wage Agreement because its benefit plan is implemented through an insurance
carrier. The Respondent states that it provides health benefits coverage at the level required by
the Employer Benefit Plan because it reimburses the Complainants for their out-of-pocket
expenses which exceed the 12-month maximum co-payment amount specified under the
Employer Benefit Plan. The Respondent has submitted copies of checks made out to some of the
Complainants as proof of their reimbursements for medical expenses.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-374
Page 2
Dispute
Is the Respondent’s implementation of its health coverage plan in violation of the 1988 Wage
Agreement?
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainants: The Respondent is in violation of the 1988 Wage Agreement by
its use of an 80/20 health coverage plan.
Position of the Respondent: The Respondent is providing the level of coverage required under
the 1988 Wage Agreement because each of the Complainants is ultimately only responsible for
payment of the co-payment amounts required under the Employer Benefit Plan.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1988 provides
in pertinent part:
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee benefit
plan to provide, implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other
non-pension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as
pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory
classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided by the
Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed
during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such
plans…. The plans established pursuant to this subsection are incorporated by
reference and made a part of this Agreement, and the terms and conditions under
which the health and other non-pension benefits will be provided under such
plans are as to be set forth in such plans.
Article (10) of the 1988 Wage Agreement provides in pertinent part:
(10) Health Care:
Explanatory Note on Employer Provided Health Plans
Active miners and their surviving spouses and dependents, and
pensioners, their dependents, and surviving spouses receiving pensions from the
1974 Pension Plan, will receive health care provided by their Employer through
insurance carriers. A health services card identifying the Participant’s eligibility
for benefits under the health plan shall be provided by the Employer.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-374
Page 3
…
Claim forms will be available at most hospitals, clinics, and physician offices.
Generally, nothing more is required than signing the forms authorizing the hospital,
clinic, or physician to bill the insurance carrier for the services rendered. The insurance
carrier will keep individual records for each Participant and dependent and will notify the
Participant of the co-payments credited to his account. The hospital, clinic, or physician
will bill the Participant for the co-payment amount until the maximum is reached. In
some instances, when the Employee pays for services or drugs, the bills should be
obtained and submitted with the claim form according to the instructions on the form. If
the annual co-payment maximum has been reached,- the carrier will remit to the
Participant the full payment for covered benefits.
Covered drug prescriptions may be filled at drugstores, clinics and hospital
prescription offices.
Article I (1), (2) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1988, as amended from time to time and any successor
agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A. (1) and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employees
Benefits under Article III shall be provided to any Employee who:
(1) is actively at work*
for the Employer on the effective date of the Wage
Agreement; or
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-374
Page 4
________
*
Actively at work includes an Employee of the Employer who was actively at work on January
31, 1988, and who returns to active work with the Employer two weeks after the effective date of
the Wage Agreement.
(4) a new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day
worked with the Employer.
Article III A. (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides in pertinent part:
Article III – Benefits
A. Health Benefits
(8) Co-Payments
Certain benefits provided in this Plan shall be subject to the co-payments
set forth below and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of the
Beneficiary….
Co-Payments for covered Health Benefits are established as follows:
Benefits Co-Payment
(a) Physician services as an out- Working Group — $7.50 per
patient as set forth in Section A visit up to a maximum of $150
(2) and physician visits in con- per 12-month period(*
) per
nection with the benefits set family.
forth in Section A(3), paragraph Non-working Group — $5 per
(c) but only for pre- and post- visit up to a maximum of $100
natal visits if the physician per 12-month period (*
) per
charges separately for such visits family.
in addition to the charge for
delivery, and paragraphs (g)
through (m), paragraph (n) except
inpatient surgery, paragraph (o)
and Section A(7) paragraph (f).
(b) Prescription drugs and $5 per prescription or refill
insulin, as set forth in up to a $50 maximum per 12-
Section A(4) and take-home month period(*
) per family.
drugs following hospital Note: For purposes of this
confinement as set forth in co-payment provision, a
Section A(l)(a). prescription or refill shall
be deemed to be each 30 days
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 88-374
Page 5
(or fraction thereof) supply.
________
*
The 12-month periods shall begin on the following dates: March 27, 1988; March 27, 1989;
March 27, 1990; March 27, 1991 and March 27, 1992.
Discussion
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1988 Wage Agreement requires a signatory Employer to
establish and maintain an Employer Benefit Plan, implemented through an insurance carrier(s),
to provide health and other non-pension benefits for its Employees. The Wage Agreement
stipulates that benefits provided by the Employer pursuant to such Plan shall be guaranteed
during the term of the Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such Plan. Article III.
A. (8) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides that certain benefits provided under the Plan shall
be subject to co-payments of $5.00 or $7.50, and such co-payments shall be the responsibility of
the beneficiary. The usual procedure for filing claims as contemplated under Article xx (10) of
the Wage Agreement is one in which the beneficiary is expected to authorize the provider to bill
the insurance carrier for services rendered and to pay only the co-payment charge set forth in
Article III. A. (8), until the specified maximum yearly amount is reached.
The Respondent provides coverage for the Complainant under an 80/20 plan implemented
through Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and has offered to reimburse the
Complainants for their out-of-pocket expenses which exceed the co-payment amounts set forth
in the Plan. The procedure for filing claims and the method of payment established by the
Respondent is inconsistent with the claim procedure contemplated under the terms of the Wage
Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan. In addition, in ROD 88-235 (copy enclosed herein),
the Trustees have previously addressed the issue of whether an Employer can partially
implement its plan through an insurance carrier and offer to pay or reimburse its Employees for
their out-of-pocket expenses in excess of the applicable co-payment amounts. In that opinion,
the Trustees concluded that such practice is inconsistent with the express provisions of the Wage
Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan. Accordingly, the Respondent’s use of a nonconforming health coverage plan and its offer to pay or reimburse Employees for certain out-of
pocket expenses are inconsistent with the express provisions of the Wage Agreement and the
Employer Benefit Plan.
Opinion of the Trustees
The Respondent’s use of a non-conforming health coverage plan and its offer to pay or reimburse
Employees for certain out-of-pocket expenses are inconsistent with the express provisions of the
1988 Wage Agreement and the Employer Benefit Plan.
